Arts & Culture 
 Business 
 Environment 
 Government 
 Health 
 Human Rights 
 Military 
 Philosophy 
 Science 
 U.S. Asian Policy 


Home > East Asia > 

On people's human rights (Part VI)
Chien-Yuan Tseng, Ph.D
2/3/2003



 Related Articles
China's terror of cyber police
On people's human rights (Part V)
On people's human rights (Part IV)
On people's human rights (Part III)
On people's human rights (Part II)
 
[Part V was published on January 27, 2003.]

6. Conclusion

Ever since the United Nations was founded, large numbers of independent nation-states entered into international laws system. With the efforts made by the third world, many new human rights concepts, different from traditional western conceptions, were brought into international laws system. In any case, a lot of documents of international human rights laws, being United Nations Charter, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Two International Covenants of Human Rights, all related international human rights treaties, resolutions of the United Nations and important international organizations, and international court’s decisions, all have their own effects on theorizing and practice of international human rights laws. All states concerned, whether being member of international organization or contracting party of treaties, must be bound and respond to it in international relationship. Neither People’s Republic of China nor the United States was full member signing the Two International Covenants of Human Rights, the former has long suffered from Western critic on human rights conditions and diplomatic problems, and the latter criticized of its double standard on human rights diplomatic policy. Although Taiwan is not a member of the United Nations, due to needs of international association, also consent to obey and follow all important resolutions passed by the United Nations. These examples proved the trend for internationalization of human rights. No state could avoid the regulation and obligations abide by international community, resorting to international human rights would generate invaluable and great effects on national image and expansion of political economic relationship.

Oppressed by political reasons, Taiwan’s diplomatic support shrank rapidly after Taiwan withdrew from the membership of the United Nations in 1971. Consequently Taiwan was barred from many important international conferences concerning development and benefit of the Taiwanese people and nowhere to express the will and opinion of the people. The internationally recognized lawful interests and benefit of Taiwan were neglected and infringed for a long time. When the international community was restricted by the claims of the People’s Republic of China and limited itself in the traditional international laws of sovereignty, Taiwan needed to be creative on the development of pragmatic international relations, in addition to endlessly trying to attend, participate in international organizations. Thus avoiding direct confrontation with the PRC and reducing possibilities of strong antagonism is useful for Taiwan to return to international community. The economic development in Taiwan used to be called a “Taiwan miracle” in the last few decades, the democratization and liberalization in the last decade won big success too. The experiences of social, economic, and political development in Taiwan are something to be proud of and worth sharing with the rest of the world, these also serve as the most powerful supports for Taiwan to contribute to the international community. This article suggests Taiwanese government turning some of the diplomatic attention to international civil society, fighting for public opinion supports and sympathy. Most of all, the government must not over look the development and trend of international human rights law and the part we could play in it to reinforce dialogue and connection in international people’s rights organizations. In one hand, Taiwan may earn worldwide respect by supporting human rights and people’s rights movement to build up the state as east Sweden; in the other hand, Taiwan may appeal to the international community of the discriminated situation and treatment Taiwan suffered, criticize PRC’s hegemony and violation on Taiwanese people’s rights, and ask the international community jointly to guarantee the realization of Taiwanese people’s rights.

Facing the international political reality, we see the fact that Taiwanese people are not fairly treated and protected by the United Nations laws system. For Taiwanese people to share justice and all that the rest of the world are entitled to enjoy by the name of people’s rights, in existence or coming to existence, would be the author’s wish as this article draws to a close.

* Tseng, Chien-Yuan is Assistant Professor at Graduate Institute of National Development of National Taiwan University, and Part-time Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration Chung-Hwa University

References:

Anthony Smith, THE ETHNIC ORIGINS OF NATIONS, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.
Antonio INTERNATIONAL LAW IN A DIVIDED WORLD, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
August, Ray, PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW: TEXT, CASES, AND READINGS, Englewood
Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1995.
Boven, Theo van, “The Relations Between Peoples’ Rights and Human Rights in the African charter”,
Arlington : HUMAN RIGHTS LAW JOURNAL, Vol.7, 1986.
Brownlie, Ian, “The Rights of Peoples in Modern International Law”, in: James Crawford eds. THE
RIGHTS OF PEOPLES, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Cassess, Antonio, “Progressive Transnational Promotion of Human Rights”, in: B. G. Ramcharan eds.,
HUMAN RIGHTS: THIRTY YEARS AFTER THE UNIVERSITY DECLARATION, The Hague:
Martinus Nijhoff, 1979.
Cassess, Antonio, HUMAN RIGHTS IN A CHANGING WORLD, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.
Cassess, Antonio, “The general Assembly: Historical Perspective 1945-1989”, in: Philip Alston eds.,
THE UNITED NATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL, Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1992.
Chiang, Huang-Chih, “On the Applicability of ‘Self-Determination’ upon the Instance of Taiwan: An
Examination Concerning the Substantive Criteria”, NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY LAW
JOURNAL 26: 2, Taipei: Department of Law National Taiwan University(=姜皇池,〈論「人民自
決」適用於台灣之可行性:實質要件之考察〉,《國立台灣大學法學論叢》,第二十六卷第二期,
台北:國立台灣大學法律學系), Jan. 1997.
Crawford, James, “The Rights of Peoples: ‘Peoples’ or ‘Government’?”, in James Crawford eds. THE
RIGHTS OF PEOPLES, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Cristescu, Aureliu, “The Right to Self-Determination: Historical and Current Development on the Basis
of United Nations Instruments”, Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission on Prevention of
Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, New York: United Nation, 1981.
Donnelly, Jack, “In Search of the Unicorn: the Jurisprudence and Politics of the Right to
Development”, (in part), in: Henry J.Steiner and Philip Alston ed., INTERNATIONAL HUMAN
RIGHTS IN CONTEXT: LAW, POLITICS, MORALS, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Falk, Richard, “The Rights of Peoples (In Particular Indigenous Peoples)”, in: James Crawford eds.
THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLES, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Henry J. Steiner and Philip Alston, INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS IN CONTEXT: LAW,
POLITICS, MORALS, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Holleman, Warren L(霍勒曼)著,汪曉丹譯,〈西方人權運動中的個人主義〉,沈宗靈、黃柟森
主編,《西方人權學說》,下,成都:四川人民出版社,Apr. 1994.
Kiss, Alexandre, “The People's Right to Self-Determination”, Arlington: HUMAN RIGHTS LAW
JOURNAL, Vol.7, 1986.
Lee, Hong-hsi(李鴻禧),〈現代國際人權的形成與發展概說一一兼談「第三代國際人權」間題〉,
《憲法與憲政》,台北:自版,1997.
Lee, Hong-hsi(李鴻禧),〈論國際法上之人權保障問題〉,《憲法與人權》,台北:自版,1985.
Lee, Tzu-wen, “The International Law of Recognition and the Republic of China”, SOOCHOW LAW
REVIEW 7:1, Taipei: Soochow University(李子文,〈國際法上之承認與中華民國〉,《東吳法律
學報》,第七卷第一期,台北:東吳大學), Feb. 1991.
Lenin, Vladimir, ”The Socialist Revolution and the Right of Nations to Self-Determination”, From
LENIN, COLLECTED WORKS, Vol. 22, (English Translated by Yuri Sdobnikov, Edited by George
Hanna), Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1964.
Lenin, Vladimir, IMPERIALISM, THE HIGHEST STAGE OF CAPITALISM, Peking: Foreign
Language Press, 1973.
Lenin, Vladimir, SOCIALISM AND WAR, Peking: Foreign Language Press, 1966.
LI Buyun, “On Individual and Collective Human Rights”, in: Peter R. Baehr, Fried van Hoof, Liu
Nanlai, Tao Zhenghua, and Jacqueline Smith ed., HUMAN RIGHTS: CHINESE AND DUTCH
PERSPECTIVES, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1996.
Ojo, Olusola and AInadu Sesay, “The O.A.U.and Human Rights: Prospects for the1980’s and beyond”,
HUMAN RIGHTS QUARTERLY, 8:1, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, Feb.1986.
Oppenheim, Lassa Francis Lawrence OPPENHEIM’S INTERNATIONAL LAW, Vol. I-PEACE,
(edited by H. Lauterpacht), London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1955.
Rich, Roland, “The Right to Development: A Right of Peoples?”, in: James Crawford eds., THE
RIGHTS OF PEOPLES, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Rigaux, Frangois, ”The Algiers Declaration of the Rights of Peoples”, in: Antonio Cassese eds., UN
LAW/FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS: TWO TOPICS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, Alphen aan den
Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff,1979.
Ronen, Dov, THE QUEST FOR SELF-DETERMINATION, New Haven: Yale University Press,
1979.
Sun, Zhe(孫哲),《新人權論》,台北:五南圖書出版有限公司,Jan 1995.
Vasak, Karel, “For the Third Generation of Human Rights: The Rights of Solidarity”, Inaugural lecture,
Tenth Study Session, International Institute of Human Rights, July 1979.
Vasak, Karel, “Human Rights: A Thirty-Year Struggle: the Sustained Efforts to give Force of law to the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, UNESCO COURIER 30: 11, Paris: United Nations
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, Nov. 1977.

I thank to Professor Hsu, Chih-Hsiung for teaching and suggesting in his seminar at National Taiwan University, Graduate Institute of Law in 1998, and Master Wang, Hui-ying for helping me to translate this paper from Chinese to English sufferingly.

First written in 1998, (Rewritten in March 2002)


© Copyright 2002-2007 AFAR